It shouldn’t be random, but it is.
I’ve been tearing a part the studio (again) for the last couple of days due to the In-Laws: Wisconsin Edition giving The Husband and me a table for the kitchen that is a much more reasonable size for our space; the previous kitchen table has moved into my studio.
Hence, the tearing a part of the studio. *shrugs*
…I do wonder how I get any art made, like, ever.
Speaking of art, I have a new artistic crush. His name is Paul Barnes. <–That’s his work about…and below…
Aren’t his creatures sweet and wee? They’re so creepily kawaii. I want one (or seven) of his paintings.
I do have a birthday coming up, but really, art is an anytime-of-the-year type of offering. *whistles*
*insert segue here*
I finished reading The Witches of Eastwick today, and all I can say is that I think that John Updike took Pat Robertson’s rant about
“The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”
a little too seriously. Also? It has every kind -ism in the history of the universe in it. The narration is all wackadoodled and sloppy. The research is lousy and seems to only have come from the caricaturization of Medieval/Early Modern in craptastic novelizations. And, quite possibly the most insulting thing, is that, after all the “I hate men”-ness that permeates the novel (even that is an overwrought caricature), all the women get married again.
It’s like the whole novel was some sort misogynistic, guilt-ridden male fantasy that had to end in marriage to make the characters, who were very much two dimensional characters who I didn’t really like and didn’t really care if horrible things happened to them, safe for work again.
Can’t have those wild, free-spirited, liberated women running around without the manacles of marriage to weigh them back down again. *EYE-ROLL HEARD AROUND THE WORLD*
Oh, and evidently, John Updike hates conceptual and postmodern art.
I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED.
And, since I’m in a ranty mood, here’s an interesting, infuriating, naively unrealistic video.
Before I begin my deconstruction and general crankiness with this video, what do y’all think? Is it just me that there are some major issues in here?
Y’all chat amongst yourselves, and I will post my rant about this video later this week (or next week’s blog at the latest).